A Road to Awakening
Most people in the United States, and much of the rest of the world, live in a dream where life is a bowl of cherries. They accept without question the endless fairy tale served up by the main stream media. But for many life is a bowl of pits, and it’s getting worse. Those living the dream will discover one day and they too will be living the nightmare.
If you’re living the nightmare you would want to convince the other half this is so, and in the process save both. Your first and main obstacle is the main stream media. A voice so loud it drowns out all others. Television, and to a lesser extent movies and radio are the greatest weapon ever invented by man. To get past it, you must get the hypnotised to question their reality and do their own investigation. The internet could save the masses.
To do that you must provide some evidence that their lives or security are in danger. To do it right you should have several things. Fortunately much has been done in the last 50 years or so by people who were living the nightmare. Here, I try to provide some starting blocks with what I know. One of the first things to know is “Everything you know is wrong”. This is not a free world and you can’t say that. The truth wears a veil in western civilization. Proving things is difficult and dangerous.
One of the first problems discovered was the banking system. The central banking system is a scam. It is mathematically impossible for the United States federal government to get out of debt. In the central banking system, money is debt and debt is money. If there was no debt, there would be no money. If there is too much debt, there is too much money. The people who collect the debt are the only people with the real game. Everyone else is just spinning their wheels. And an even more absurd fact is they don’t deserve a penny of what they collect because they didn’t put up any collateral. The system creates money out of thin air and they collect both the principle and interest. The documentary ‘The Zeitgeist Movie’ cites a Minnesota case where a man stopped the bank from taking his house by proving the bank voided the contract because it didn’t put up any collateral. It created the money out of thin air. Bankruptcy and inflation are unavoidable. When someone, or a country, goes bankrupt they take property in exchange and don’t deserve it. The banking system will either conquer the world by bankruptcy or crash from a mountain of debt. One of the first people to document this was Thomas Paine in his book “The Decline and Fall of the English System of Finance”. He also wrote “Common Sense” a pamphlet used to start the American Revolution.
With the truth about the banking system you could convince a lot of people their world is in danger. Everyone needs money. Despite what people say, they always vote their wallet before any idea or principle. Unfortunately the elections are a joke too. Freedoms an illusion, film at eleven. A second place to look is history. Napolean said once “History is a lie agreed upon”. One of the first places to start is the history of the banking system. Why didn’t I know this? The Bank of England was the first central bank. It was founded in 1694 by William of Orange, the king of England. It was a response to two revolutions that took place in England in the 17th century, one of which succeeded in toppling the king. He was executed. The second didn’t succeed. It is a bottomless bank account used to buy whatever is needed to hold power. They can manipulate the currency and wage war against it’s own citizens. In the decades following the turn of the 18th century they developed a political system called ‘Oligarchical Collectivism’. They will share power and access to the banking system with anyone who will be as ruthless and greedy as they are. Below is a paragraph taken from George Orwell’s book ’1984′:
‘In accordance with principles it does not matter if the war is real or whether victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won. It is meant to be continuous. The essential act of modern warfare is the destruction of human production and labor. A hierarchial society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. In principle the war is planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against it’s own subjects and it’s object is not victory but to keep the very structure of society intact.’
A second place to look is the English Reformation. Religion is an important part of how oligarchical collectivism works. Stalin once said ‘Religion is the opium of the mass’s’. Like everything else in western civilization it is run for and by the rich. I do not have a problem with religions or religious people. My problem is with their organization. I do not endorse Islam, but in Islam every mosque stands alone. It is not part of a massive organization. After a muslim cleric learns his theology he goes to a mosque and has no boss outside of that. The people who go to church on Sunday are not the problem, it’s the people who run the church’s. And the bigger they are the bigger the problem. When looking at the English Reformation the idea is to prove that the church divided itself to form two groups that the kings could pit against each other to satisfy Orwell’s ‘Theory of Oligarchical Collectivism’.
Significant questions are:
Why was Henry VIII obsessed with having a son? Two of his daughters, Mary I and Elizabeth I, held the throne anyway. Did England abandon Salic Law 100 years earlier? Why was James VI of Scotland (also James I of England) brought up a protestant if his mother, Mary Queen of Scots, was born and died a catholic? Why did James I produce the King James Bible? Why did he leave out the Apocraphyl Books? Why was Elizabeth I called ‘The Virgin Queen’? Was this intentional so the throne could go to James I? Thomas More is both a saint in the catholic church and a sir for the British Empire. He was executed in the Henry VIII affair. He wrote a book about utopia. In fact I think he coined the phrase utopia. The United States is an invention of the Catholic Church and the monarchs of Europe. Does the concept of a utopia have anything to do with the Trojan War thing? Is America the utopia he talked about? Was it made up to keep the mass’s happy so they wouldn’t actually revolt?
Another place is the controversy surrounding Joan of Arc and Gilles de Rais. Joan of Arc was considered a whore up to the 20th century. Then she was made a saint. Why? Gilles de Rais fought alongside her but is still demonized as a monster. Why? Gilles is considered the first ‘bluebeard’. What is a bluebeard? Was Quasimodo of ‘The Hunchback of Notre Dame’ a bluebeard?
A fourth place is the Spanish Civil War of the 1930′s. George Orwell fought for a time on the side of the republicans against the fascists. He wrote about his experience in the book “Homage to Catalonia”. When he got to the front he recieved little or no training. All the people he fought with had the same amount of training. He had no uniform. His rifle was 30 years old, his unit had one machine gun for every 50 men. Most of the injuries suffered by his unit were caused by their own equipment. After several months of fighting he got 3 days in Barcelona. While there fighting broke out. After it ended government troops arrived. The same government he was fighting for. They had new uniforms, were trained and had one machine gun for every 10 men. When he discovered this he was forced to flee the country.
World War I was a slaughter on both sides. In about 4 years of fighting no real progress was made by anyone, yet millions of men died. No one really knows why it was fought. George Seldes was a reporter at the time. He was considered a muchracker, someone who didn’t go along with the pack. He covered the end of the war and called it a complete sham. A hero of that war, Smedley Butler, later wrote a book “War is a Racket”.
There are a lot of questions surrounding Benjamin Disraeli and the current state of Israel. Disraeli was an Englishman who lived in the 1800′s. He was British Prime Minister twice. Many believe he is responsible for the situation in Israel.
My take on Israel. The Allies (also known as everyone involved) during WWII didn’t liberate the Nazi concentration camps but instead relocated them to Palestine and called it Israel. The Zeitgeist Movie points out that 100 million people in the United States are convinced the end times are here. They are all waiting to be raptured into heaven. The movie “Ring of Power” says the same thing. They add that the battle of Armageddon will take place in Isreal. Why did they leave the Apocraphyl Books out of the King James Version of the bible? I ask only because the word ‘apocraphyl’ and ‘apolcalypse’ may be derived from the same word.
Thomas Paine, who wrote the pamphlet ‘Common Sense’, came to America just before the revolution. Common Sense was read in pubs and churches before the war and was instrumental in getting the war started. In it he criticizes the English form of government. He points out that any government with 3 houses (not to be confused with 3 branches) can be easily controlled if anyone controls two. The English government can always be controlled with the House of Lords and the Monarchy. The House of Commons is powerless and only gives the illusion of freedom. The people who fought the revolution fully expected to go back to their lives and governments as they were when the war was over. The Federal government was an afterthought. The justification for it was made years later by the Federalist Papers. How quickly people forget. All anyone needs is a handful of senators and the president and they control the government. We only have the illusion of freedom.
Studying the history of the Jesuits might also help. The Jesuits were formed at the time of The Reformation. They are unofficially the Popes army. The military wing of the catholic church. The only time they were suppressed, but not eliminated, was from July 1773 to around 1825. In December 1773 The Boston Tea Party took place. Does this seem too coincidental? Did we fight a revolution and liberate ourselves from ourselves? Did we create our own false utopia? The Jesuits use guerrilla tactics. According to Sun Tzu, a chinese military strategist ‘You cannot win a war against guerrilla tactics’. Investigating the relationship between Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a Jesuit priest, and the beginnings of The Church of Scientology is a very good place.
Ignatius of Loyola was born 1491 and died July 31, 1556. He is the founder of The Society of Jesus or commonly known as the Jesuits. They are considered the Popes army and are responsible for the activities of the counter-reformation. He is a saint in the Catholic Church.
Jean Joseph Marie Amiot was born Feb 1718 and died October 9 1793. He was a Jesuit missionary in China. He was the first to translate ‘The Art of War’ a treatise by a Chinese military strategist known as Sun Tzu. In this book Sun Tzu states ‘It is impossible to win a war against guerrila tactics’.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was born May 1, 1881 and died April 10, 1955. He was a French philosopher and Jesuit priest who trained as a paleontologist and geologist and took part in the discovery of Peking Man. He originated the idea of the Omega Point. Did he have anything to do with the beginnings of Scientology? Teilhard and his work have a continuing presence in the arts and culture. He inspired a number of characters in literary works. References range from occasional quotations, an auto mechanic quotes Teilhard in Philip K. Dick’s A Scanner Darkly, to serving as the philosophical underpinning of the plot, as Teilhard’s work does in Julian May’s 1987–94 Galactic Milieu Series. Teilhard also plays a major role in Annie Dillard’s 1999 For the Time Being. Characters based on Teilhard appear in several novels, including Jean Telemond in Morris West’s The Shoes of the Fisherman (mentioned by name and quoted by Oskar Werner playing Fr. Telemond in the movie version of the novel) and Father Lankester Merrin in William Peter Blatty’s The Exorcist. In Dan Simmons’ 1989–97 Hyperion Cantos, Teilhard de Chardin has been canonized a saint in the far future. His work inspires the anthropologist priest character, Paul DurĂ©. When DurĂ© becomes Pope, he takes Teilhard I as his regnal name.
Aside from the obvious wars reported in newspapers the powers that be manage to get us to fight mythical wars. The Trojan War was supposedly fought between Greece and Troy. It was fought over a woman. Helen of Troy. The war was fought for ten years outside the walls of Troy before the Greeks won. Homer’s ‘The Iliad and the Odyssey’ chronicles the war. Aleister Crowley, a writer and cultist, wrote a book “Alice (in Wonderland) is an Adultery”. ‘Alice in Wonderland’ is a parallel story to ‘The Iliad and the Odyssey’. It is roughly the same thing. One side or the other in the mythical war sends one of it’s young girls on an mission of adultery to lure a male away from home to destroy his life and possibly hers. She is sometimes convinced ‘all that glitters is gold’. The adultery causes division among the sides, like Greece and Troy, and makes for further hostilities. It’s all a setup. The people in charge of it all just want to make trouble for the people at the bottom.
As I said before “the truth wears a veil in western civilization’. Fiction is non-fiction and non-fiction is fiction. Aside from ‘Alice in Wonderland’ some revealing novels are: Gulivers Travels- Written in 1730 it is a glimpse into how the oligarchy collective works. Others are ‘The Hunchback of Notre Dame’, The Grapes of Wrath’ and “Tom Sawyer’. Anything by Shakespear.
The central banking system is an economic tool for holding power. But it is just a piece of a larger body of knowledge on economics that is used. This knowledge was outlined in The Scottish Enlightenment of the 1700′s. The main work was Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations”. It is the manual for economic domination used today all over the world. It is mathematically impossible for the United Sates Federal government to ever get out of debt. Or any other country with a central bank, which is every country on earth. The really absurd thing is the people collecting the debt don’t deserve anything. They didn’t put up a penny of collateral. ‘The Zeitgeist Movie’ cites a Minnesota case where a man stopped the bank from foreclosing on his house by proving the bank created the money out of thin air.
Ultimitely, it’s a question of slavery. The modern world is the wage slave system. In the wage slave system the slave himself is responsible for his own housing and food. All system’s of slavery are designed to overproduce. The excess is sold by the owner so he/she can live in luxury. All system’s of slavery benefit only a few. Poverty and/or primitive culture is the natural state of the world. The wage slave system has driven mankind and the entire planet to the edge and it is not sustainable. Slave system’s naturally overproduce all life sustaining products so populations run out of control. They eat up land and resources. At some point those two dynamics collide and everyone suffers, including the slave owners. The global elite require drastic measures to remain in power, and they are working towards this. DON’T ACCEPT AN IMPLANT!
Who’s winning the battle to implement communism, the proletariat or the bourgeois? I believe communism is the end result of capitalism. It is being implemented through fabianism. Fabianism is a strategy of slow and steady progress. There is a Fabian Society dedicated to socialism. H G Wells was a member. He wrote a book titled “New World Order”. I believe that communism and socialism don’t exist. They are political ideology’s designed to keep the mass’s busy while the banking system takes over the world. The true end result is ‘Times New Roman’. We will be back to a Ceasar. Karl Marx outlined 10 things needed to implement communism. I list them below and try to point out the ones I think are already in place.
Capitalism=Communism=Fabianism=Times New Roman. ‘Nothing changes New Years Day…. The history of the white caucasion, or western civilization, is a history of the struggle with Rome. The Muslim world is an example of a culture that is somewhat successful at defeating it. The Pilgrims here in New England is another, but is in the final stages of being destroyed. ‘There is a house in New Orleans…. The term Islamo-Fascism does not make sense. The Muslims are not as money happy as Europeans. We are in the Middle East because we are at war with Islam. No one shall deviate. Israel was put there on purpose to make trouble. It is possible Benjamin Disraeli is responsible.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents to land for public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all right to inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5.. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6.Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands: and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries: gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children. Abolition of child factory labor in it’s present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
1. I don't believe in abolishing of property but the redistribution of it. Right now there is too much wealth property and power in the hands of too few.
2. At the end of the 19th century we went through ‘The Gilded Age’. The rich enjoyed life as never before. Everyone wanted a monopoly on something. Someone would corner the market on something then charge whatever they wanted. Flour, sugar, coffee etc. They called them trusts. The mansions in Newport RI were built with this money. Teddy Roosevelt passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to break up the trusts and lower prices for everyone. They later passed an income tax law that was also supposed to help. Maybe it did maybe it didn’t. It now funds endless wars and it’s wasteful industry’s. As Orwell pointed out, war is meant to keep the poor on it’s knees. It also funds the welfare state. The welfare state does not help the poor. It gives them just enough to get by and not pick up a gun. It stops them from building something for themselves. It gives corporate welfare to take away opportunity for them. Give a man a fish, feed him for a day, teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime. The income tax now works for the rich.
3. Inheritance is overtaxed now, but it is hurting small corporations more than large.
4. This one I don’t understand.
5. We have centralization of the credit, but it is in private hands. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank. The word ‘Federal’ is decieving. It is owned by private individuals who we can never get out of debt to. And they don’t deserve a penny.
6. The Interstate Highway system surreptitiously centralizes the transport system. People don’t realize it doesn’t have to be built that way. It gives too much power to the government. In the old west people would vie for a railroad stop in thier town. It would bring people and commerce. If the trains stopped the town would die. I often call the interstate highway system ‘Automobile Railroads’. They should be built as surface roads. Anyone with land that abutts the road should have access. This would provide infinite economic opportunity for people.
I don’t know what this is for. Leave waste land waste land. Stop building suburbs. Each city should be as self supporting as possible. Global trade slowly makes us interdependant as nations. (World Trade is a 9-1-1) If they ever come out of the closet we will all discover that our basic needs come from a foreign country. No one here will know how to raise cattle etc. People will surrender very quickly.
7. I have no problem requiring anyone who can work to work. But it is better they employ themselves and build and acquire wealth. This would lead to satisfying Marx’s first condition for communism to end up in the hands of the poor. But at that point why bother?
8. I think the suburbinization of America should be reversed. It wastes land. It makes the population even more dependant on the controlled transport and communication structure.
9. Free education through High School is OK. But a High School education should be enough. It is entirely too complicated, expensive and difficult to make a living in this country.
10. No child labor.
I have some thoughts on inflation. All 3 Zeitgeist movies bring it up as a concern in a money as debt, debt as money system. So I’m trying to understand. Inflation is when the value of a currency goes down and it requires more of the same currency to buy an item over a short period of time. The price of the item goes up. I was born in 1957. For the first ten years of my life a candy bar was a nickel. You could get 6 for a quarter. Not little candy bars, the big ones. My parents grew up in the 1930′s. They have talked about going to the store with a dime for bread and milk. So thats kinda the same thing. Thirty years apart, not much had changed. After 1967 and beyond it really got out of control. A candy bar was a dollar in the 1970′s. Why. When Gerald Ford took office after Nixon he had the WIN campaign. Whip Inflation Now. Everyone was supposed to wear a WIN button. People thought he was a dope. What really causes inflation? Lets take strawberries as an example. In a capitalist society if the price of strawberries got out of control the free market is supposed to fill the void and stabilze the price. So if it was too expensive to ship them from California local growers would step in. Why isn’t this happening? This is my best guess. In a society where money is debt and debt is money, if there were no debt there would be no money. The opposite is also true. If there is too much debt there is too much money, thus reducing it’s buying power. Anyone can go into a bank get a loan and expand the money supply. So no one really has control of the value of the currency. If too many loans are being written the value of the currency goes down. The government does not own the Federal Reserve. It goes to the bank just like everyone else. If the government borrows money willy nilly inflation would be out of control. Like back in the 70′s. Why did the government start borrowing money like that?
In Eisenhowers Farewell Speech he says:
In this revolution research has become central, it has also become more formalized, costly and complex. A steadily increasing share is done for by or at the direction of the federal government. …
He continues:
A government contract becomes a substitute for intellectual curiosity…
He says later.
We must also guard against the equal and opposite danger that public policy itself could become the captive of a scientific technological elite..
Has someone been holding the government hostage since the 1960′s? How much control have they had since then. Who is doing it? A conclusion could be drawn that the only way to control the value of the currency is control the number of people who go into banks. This becomes even more important if you needed to cover up out of control government spending. Inflation has largely been under control since the 1980′s. Is this what Scientology is for?
As capitalism progresses to communism through fabianism the poor and destitute class keeps getting bigger and must be dealt with. Karl Marx called them the ‘proletariat’. Here is an example of how the proletariat gets bigger. Adam Smith who wrote ‘The Wealth of Nations. called this phenomenah ‘the invisible hand’. I don’t recall his exact example so I’ll use one of my inventions. One of my inventions (on the invention page) replaces the old method of making PCB’s. Printed circuit boards. With the old method a lot of shorts and opens are made because the process is very inexact. Shorts and opens are electronic terms for the board don’t work. Companies hire a lot of people to test and inspect the boards to get them to work. My invention would produce boards with less defects so companies would hire fewer of those people and the proletariat gets bigger. Whoever is screwing with me is solving the problem of the proletariat for the rich. I suspect it is Scientology. This is why psychiatry is genocide. This is why they want to control the population.
More thoughts on inflation. How the proletariat gets bigger was revealed by Karl Marx in ‘The Communist Manifesto’ in 1848. The rich are always improving the modes of production to cut costs and increase profits. The patent office is the incentive. If this is happening as it should why are prices going up? This is something I don’t understand about solar cells and solar electricity. If this is working as it should the cost of solar should have gone down a long time ago. But it may be that the oil industry is stopping it. I talked about the strawberries. Question, does the government pay people with farm land to not grow anything? Why? Does this keep prices high? Does this keep certain people in business? Does this force global trade? How bad is the mind control problem?
Despite an ugly highway cutting through the middle, downtown Boston had a lot of small business’s. Pizza joints, bars and other things. Haymarket was an open air market where there was all manner of stuff. Now, after the Big Dig it is just strip mall America in big buildings. Kenmore Square is near the same.
Channel 7 used to be the CBS affiliate here in Boston. Channel 4 was the NBC. About ten years ago they swapped, kinda without notice. I am not exactly sure what this has to do with anything. Back in the 1970′s there was a court fight for the license for Channel 7. (I’m pretty sure) Someone just went into court and said the owners of Channel 7 were not running the station in the best interest of the public as defined by the FCC, I’m pretty sure they won.
There is too much wealth property and power in the hands of too few people. Mutual funds became very popular in the 1980′s. One type of fund is an index fund. The idea is to buy every stock on a particular index, say the S & P 500, and hold it for a long period. Historically the markets gain value over long periods. I believe that idea stops working if there isn’t enough stocks openly traded among individual investors. This is made worse when there aren’t enough small investors. I talked about how I thought downtown Boston was strip mall America in big buildings. All those small investors are gone. The entire market can be controlled by a very few people. It only looks like we all own it. If there is too large a percentage of stocks just sitting waiting and another large percentage in the hands of the very rich it will never move.
Most people in the United States, and much of the rest of the world, live in a dream where life is a bowl of cherries. They accept without question the endless fairy tale served up by the main stream media. But for many life is a bowl of pits, and it’s getting worse. Those living the dream will discover one day and they too will be living the nightmare.
If you’re living the nightmare you would want to convince the other half this is so, and in the process save both. Your first and main obstacle is the main stream media. A voice so loud it drowns out all others. Television, and to a lesser extent movies and radio are the greatest weapon ever invented by man. To get past it, you must get the hypnotised to question their reality and do their own investigation. The internet could save the masses.
To do that you must provide some evidence that their lives or security are in danger. To do it right you should have several things. Fortunately much has been done in the last 50 years or so by people who were living the nightmare. Here, I try to provide some starting blocks with what I know. One of the first things to know is “Everything you know is wrong”. This is not a free world and you can’t say that. The truth wears a veil in western civilization. Proving things is difficult and dangerous.
One of the first problems discovered was the banking system. The central banking system is a scam. It is mathematically impossible for the United States federal government to get out of debt. In the central banking system, money is debt and debt is money. If there was no debt, there would be no money. If there is too much debt, there is too much money. The people who collect the debt are the only people with the real game. Everyone else is just spinning their wheels. And an even more absurd fact is they don’t deserve a penny of what they collect because they didn’t put up any collateral. The system creates money out of thin air and they collect both the principle and interest. The documentary ‘The Zeitgeist Movie’ cites a Minnesota case where a man stopped the bank from taking his house by proving the bank voided the contract because it didn’t put up any collateral. It created the money out of thin air. Bankruptcy and inflation are unavoidable. When someone, or a country, goes bankrupt they take property in exchange and don’t deserve it. The banking system will either conquer the world by bankruptcy or crash from a mountain of debt. One of the first people to document this was Thomas Paine in his book “The Decline and Fall of the English System of Finance”. He also wrote “Common Sense” a pamphlet used to start the American Revolution.
With the truth about the banking system you could convince a lot of people their world is in danger. Everyone needs money. Despite what people say, they always vote their wallet before any idea or principle. Unfortunately the elections are a joke too. Freedoms an illusion, film at eleven. A second place to look is history. Napolean said once “History is a lie agreed upon”. One of the first places to start is the history of the banking system. Why didn’t I know this? The Bank of England was the first central bank. It was founded in 1694 by William of Orange, the king of England. It was a response to two revolutions that took place in England in the 17th century, one of which succeeded in toppling the king. He was executed. The second didn’t succeed. It is a bottomless bank account used to buy whatever is needed to hold power. They can manipulate the currency and wage war against it’s own citizens. In the decades following the turn of the 18th century they developed a political system called ‘Oligarchical Collectivism’. They will share power and access to the banking system with anyone who will be as ruthless and greedy as they are. Below is a paragraph taken from George Orwell’s book ’1984′:
‘In accordance with principles it does not matter if the war is real or whether victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won. It is meant to be continuous. The essential act of modern warfare is the destruction of human production and labor. A hierarchial society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. In principle the war is planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against it’s own subjects and it’s object is not victory but to keep the very structure of society intact.’
A second place to look is the English Reformation. Religion is an important part of how oligarchical collectivism works. Stalin once said ‘Religion is the opium of the mass’s’. Like everything else in western civilization it is run for and by the rich. I do not have a problem with religions or religious people. My problem is with their organization. I do not endorse Islam, but in Islam every mosque stands alone. It is not part of a massive organization. After a muslim cleric learns his theology he goes to a mosque and has no boss outside of that. The people who go to church on Sunday are not the problem, it’s the people who run the church’s. And the bigger they are the bigger the problem. When looking at the English Reformation the idea is to prove that the church divided itself to form two groups that the kings could pit against each other to satisfy Orwell’s ‘Theory of Oligarchical Collectivism’.
Significant questions are:
Why was Henry VIII obsessed with having a son? Two of his daughters, Mary I and Elizabeth I, held the throne anyway. Did England abandon Salic Law 100 years earlier? Why was James VI of Scotland (also James I of England) brought up a protestant if his mother, Mary Queen of Scots, was born and died a catholic? Why did James I produce the King James Bible? Why did he leave out the Apocraphyl Books? Why was Elizabeth I called ‘The Virgin Queen’? Was this intentional so the throne could go to James I? Thomas More is both a saint in the catholic church and a sir for the British Empire. He was executed in the Henry VIII affair. He wrote a book about utopia. In fact I think he coined the phrase utopia. The United States is an invention of the Catholic Church and the monarchs of Europe. Does the concept of a utopia have anything to do with the Trojan War thing? Is America the utopia he talked about? Was it made up to keep the mass’s happy so they wouldn’t actually revolt?
Another place is the controversy surrounding Joan of Arc and Gilles de Rais. Joan of Arc was considered a whore up to the 20th century. Then she was made a saint. Why? Gilles de Rais fought alongside her but is still demonized as a monster. Why? Gilles is considered the first ‘bluebeard’. What is a bluebeard? Was Quasimodo of ‘The Hunchback of Notre Dame’ a bluebeard?
A fourth place is the Spanish Civil War of the 1930′s. George Orwell fought for a time on the side of the republicans against the fascists. He wrote about his experience in the book “Homage to Catalonia”. When he got to the front he recieved little or no training. All the people he fought with had the same amount of training. He had no uniform. His rifle was 30 years old, his unit had one machine gun for every 50 men. Most of the injuries suffered by his unit were caused by their own equipment. After several months of fighting he got 3 days in Barcelona. While there fighting broke out. After it ended government troops arrived. The same government he was fighting for. They had new uniforms, were trained and had one machine gun for every 10 men. When he discovered this he was forced to flee the country.
World War I was a slaughter on both sides. In about 4 years of fighting no real progress was made by anyone, yet millions of men died. No one really knows why it was fought. George Seldes was a reporter at the time. He was considered a muchracker, someone who didn’t go along with the pack. He covered the end of the war and called it a complete sham. A hero of that war, Smedley Butler, later wrote a book “War is a Racket”.
There are a lot of questions surrounding Benjamin Disraeli and the current state of Israel. Disraeli was an Englishman who lived in the 1800′s. He was British Prime Minister twice. Many believe he is responsible for the situation in Israel.
My take on Israel. The Allies (also known as everyone involved) during WWII didn’t liberate the Nazi concentration camps but instead relocated them to Palestine and called it Israel. The Zeitgeist Movie points out that 100 million people in the United States are convinced the end times are here. They are all waiting to be raptured into heaven. The movie “Ring of Power” says the same thing. They add that the battle of Armageddon will take place in Isreal. Why did they leave the Apocraphyl Books out of the King James Version of the bible? I ask only because the word ‘apocraphyl’ and ‘apolcalypse’ may be derived from the same word.
Thomas Paine, who wrote the pamphlet ‘Common Sense’, came to America just before the revolution. Common Sense was read in pubs and churches before the war and was instrumental in getting the war started. In it he criticizes the English form of government. He points out that any government with 3 houses (not to be confused with 3 branches) can be easily controlled if anyone controls two. The English government can always be controlled with the House of Lords and the Monarchy. The House of Commons is powerless and only gives the illusion of freedom. The people who fought the revolution fully expected to go back to their lives and governments as they were when the war was over. The Federal government was an afterthought. The justification for it was made years later by the Federalist Papers. How quickly people forget. All anyone needs is a handful of senators and the president and they control the government. We only have the illusion of freedom.
Studying the history of the Jesuits might also help. The Jesuits were formed at the time of The Reformation. They are unofficially the Popes army. The military wing of the catholic church. The only time they were suppressed, but not eliminated, was from July 1773 to around 1825. In December 1773 The Boston Tea Party took place. Does this seem too coincidental? Did we fight a revolution and liberate ourselves from ourselves? Did we create our own false utopia? The Jesuits use guerrilla tactics. According to Sun Tzu, a chinese military strategist ‘You cannot win a war against guerrilla tactics’. Investigating the relationship between Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a Jesuit priest, and the beginnings of The Church of Scientology is a very good place.
Ignatius of Loyola was born 1491 and died July 31, 1556. He is the founder of The Society of Jesus or commonly known as the Jesuits. They are considered the Popes army and are responsible for the activities of the counter-reformation. He is a saint in the Catholic Church.
Jean Joseph Marie Amiot was born Feb 1718 and died October 9 1793. He was a Jesuit missionary in China. He was the first to translate ‘The Art of War’ a treatise by a Chinese military strategist known as Sun Tzu. In this book Sun Tzu states ‘It is impossible to win a war against guerrila tactics’.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was born May 1, 1881 and died April 10, 1955. He was a French philosopher and Jesuit priest who trained as a paleontologist and geologist and took part in the discovery of Peking Man. He originated the idea of the Omega Point. Did he have anything to do with the beginnings of Scientology? Teilhard and his work have a continuing presence in the arts and culture. He inspired a number of characters in literary works. References range from occasional quotations, an auto mechanic quotes Teilhard in Philip K. Dick’s A Scanner Darkly, to serving as the philosophical underpinning of the plot, as Teilhard’s work does in Julian May’s 1987–94 Galactic Milieu Series. Teilhard also plays a major role in Annie Dillard’s 1999 For the Time Being. Characters based on Teilhard appear in several novels, including Jean Telemond in Morris West’s The Shoes of the Fisherman (mentioned by name and quoted by Oskar Werner playing Fr. Telemond in the movie version of the novel) and Father Lankester Merrin in William Peter Blatty’s The Exorcist. In Dan Simmons’ 1989–97 Hyperion Cantos, Teilhard de Chardin has been canonized a saint in the far future. His work inspires the anthropologist priest character, Paul DurĂ©. When DurĂ© becomes Pope, he takes Teilhard I as his regnal name.
Aside from the obvious wars reported in newspapers the powers that be manage to get us to fight mythical wars. The Trojan War was supposedly fought between Greece and Troy. It was fought over a woman. Helen of Troy. The war was fought for ten years outside the walls of Troy before the Greeks won. Homer’s ‘The Iliad and the Odyssey’ chronicles the war. Aleister Crowley, a writer and cultist, wrote a book “Alice (in Wonderland) is an Adultery”. ‘Alice in Wonderland’ is a parallel story to ‘The Iliad and the Odyssey’. It is roughly the same thing. One side or the other in the mythical war sends one of it’s young girls on an mission of adultery to lure a male away from home to destroy his life and possibly hers. She is sometimes convinced ‘all that glitters is gold’. The adultery causes division among the sides, like Greece and Troy, and makes for further hostilities. It’s all a setup. The people in charge of it all just want to make trouble for the people at the bottom.
As I said before “the truth wears a veil in western civilization’. Fiction is non-fiction and non-fiction is fiction. Aside from ‘Alice in Wonderland’ some revealing novels are: Gulivers Travels- Written in 1730 it is a glimpse into how the oligarchy collective works. Others are ‘The Hunchback of Notre Dame’, The Grapes of Wrath’ and “Tom Sawyer’. Anything by Shakespear.
The central banking system is an economic tool for holding power. But it is just a piece of a larger body of knowledge on economics that is used. This knowledge was outlined in The Scottish Enlightenment of the 1700′s. The main work was Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations”. It is the manual for economic domination used today all over the world. It is mathematically impossible for the United Sates Federal government to ever get out of debt. Or any other country with a central bank, which is every country on earth. The really absurd thing is the people collecting the debt don’t deserve anything. They didn’t put up a penny of collateral. ‘The Zeitgeist Movie’ cites a Minnesota case where a man stopped the bank from foreclosing on his house by proving the bank created the money out of thin air.
Ultimitely, it’s a question of slavery. The modern world is the wage slave system. In the wage slave system the slave himself is responsible for his own housing and food. All system’s of slavery are designed to overproduce. The excess is sold by the owner so he/she can live in luxury. All system’s of slavery benefit only a few. Poverty and/or primitive culture is the natural state of the world. The wage slave system has driven mankind and the entire planet to the edge and it is not sustainable. Slave system’s naturally overproduce all life sustaining products so populations run out of control. They eat up land and resources. At some point those two dynamics collide and everyone suffers, including the slave owners. The global elite require drastic measures to remain in power, and they are working towards this. DON’T ACCEPT AN IMPLANT!
Who’s winning the battle to implement communism, the proletariat or the bourgeois? I believe communism is the end result of capitalism. It is being implemented through fabianism. Fabianism is a strategy of slow and steady progress. There is a Fabian Society dedicated to socialism. H G Wells was a member. He wrote a book titled “New World Order”. I believe that communism and socialism don’t exist. They are political ideology’s designed to keep the mass’s busy while the banking system takes over the world. The true end result is ‘Times New Roman’. We will be back to a Ceasar. Karl Marx outlined 10 things needed to implement communism. I list them below and try to point out the ones I think are already in place.
Capitalism=Communism=Fabianism=Times New Roman. ‘Nothing changes New Years Day…. The history of the white caucasion, or western civilization, is a history of the struggle with Rome. The Muslim world is an example of a culture that is somewhat successful at defeating it. The Pilgrims here in New England is another, but is in the final stages of being destroyed. ‘There is a house in New Orleans…. The term Islamo-Fascism does not make sense. The Muslims are not as money happy as Europeans. We are in the Middle East because we are at war with Islam. No one shall deviate. Israel was put there on purpose to make trouble. It is possible Benjamin Disraeli is responsible.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents to land for public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all right to inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5.. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6.Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands: and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries: gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children. Abolition of child factory labor in it’s present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
1. I don't believe in abolishing of property but the redistribution of it. Right now there is too much wealth property and power in the hands of too few.
2. At the end of the 19th century we went through ‘The Gilded Age’. The rich enjoyed life as never before. Everyone wanted a monopoly on something. Someone would corner the market on something then charge whatever they wanted. Flour, sugar, coffee etc. They called them trusts. The mansions in Newport RI were built with this money. Teddy Roosevelt passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to break up the trusts and lower prices for everyone. They later passed an income tax law that was also supposed to help. Maybe it did maybe it didn’t. It now funds endless wars and it’s wasteful industry’s. As Orwell pointed out, war is meant to keep the poor on it’s knees. It also funds the welfare state. The welfare state does not help the poor. It gives them just enough to get by and not pick up a gun. It stops them from building something for themselves. It gives corporate welfare to take away opportunity for them. Give a man a fish, feed him for a day, teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime. The income tax now works for the rich.
3. Inheritance is overtaxed now, but it is hurting small corporations more than large.
4. This one I don’t understand.
5. We have centralization of the credit, but it is in private hands. The Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank. The word ‘Federal’ is decieving. It is owned by private individuals who we can never get out of debt to. And they don’t deserve a penny.
6. The Interstate Highway system surreptitiously centralizes the transport system. People don’t realize it doesn’t have to be built that way. It gives too much power to the government. In the old west people would vie for a railroad stop in thier town. It would bring people and commerce. If the trains stopped the town would die. I often call the interstate highway system ‘Automobile Railroads’. They should be built as surface roads. Anyone with land that abutts the road should have access. This would provide infinite economic opportunity for people.
I don’t know what this is for. Leave waste land waste land. Stop building suburbs. Each city should be as self supporting as possible. Global trade slowly makes us interdependant as nations. (World Trade is a 9-1-1) If they ever come out of the closet we will all discover that our basic needs come from a foreign country. No one here will know how to raise cattle etc. People will surrender very quickly.
7. I have no problem requiring anyone who can work to work. But it is better they employ themselves and build and acquire wealth. This would lead to satisfying Marx’s first condition for communism to end up in the hands of the poor. But at that point why bother?
8. I think the suburbinization of America should be reversed. It wastes land. It makes the population even more dependant on the controlled transport and communication structure.
9. Free education through High School is OK. But a High School education should be enough. It is entirely too complicated, expensive and difficult to make a living in this country.
10. No child labor.
I have some thoughts on inflation. All 3 Zeitgeist movies bring it up as a concern in a money as debt, debt as money system. So I’m trying to understand. Inflation is when the value of a currency goes down and it requires more of the same currency to buy an item over a short period of time. The price of the item goes up. I was born in 1957. For the first ten years of my life a candy bar was a nickel. You could get 6 for a quarter. Not little candy bars, the big ones. My parents grew up in the 1930′s. They have talked about going to the store with a dime for bread and milk. So thats kinda the same thing. Thirty years apart, not much had changed. After 1967 and beyond it really got out of control. A candy bar was a dollar in the 1970′s. Why. When Gerald Ford took office after Nixon he had the WIN campaign. Whip Inflation Now. Everyone was supposed to wear a WIN button. People thought he was a dope. What really causes inflation? Lets take strawberries as an example. In a capitalist society if the price of strawberries got out of control the free market is supposed to fill the void and stabilze the price. So if it was too expensive to ship them from California local growers would step in. Why isn’t this happening? This is my best guess. In a society where money is debt and debt is money, if there were no debt there would be no money. The opposite is also true. If there is too much debt there is too much money, thus reducing it’s buying power. Anyone can go into a bank get a loan and expand the money supply. So no one really has control of the value of the currency. If too many loans are being written the value of the currency goes down. The government does not own the Federal Reserve. It goes to the bank just like everyone else. If the government borrows money willy nilly inflation would be out of control. Like back in the 70′s. Why did the government start borrowing money like that?
In Eisenhowers Farewell Speech he says:
In this revolution research has become central, it has also become more formalized, costly and complex. A steadily increasing share is done for by or at the direction of the federal government. …
He continues:
A government contract becomes a substitute for intellectual curiosity…
He says later.
We must also guard against the equal and opposite danger that public policy itself could become the captive of a scientific technological elite..
Has someone been holding the government hostage since the 1960′s? How much control have they had since then. Who is doing it? A conclusion could be drawn that the only way to control the value of the currency is control the number of people who go into banks. This becomes even more important if you needed to cover up out of control government spending. Inflation has largely been under control since the 1980′s. Is this what Scientology is for?
As capitalism progresses to communism through fabianism the poor and destitute class keeps getting bigger and must be dealt with. Karl Marx called them the ‘proletariat’. Here is an example of how the proletariat gets bigger. Adam Smith who wrote ‘The Wealth of Nations. called this phenomenah ‘the invisible hand’. I don’t recall his exact example so I’ll use one of my inventions. One of my inventions (on the invention page) replaces the old method of making PCB’s. Printed circuit boards. With the old method a lot of shorts and opens are made because the process is very inexact. Shorts and opens are electronic terms for the board don’t work. Companies hire a lot of people to test and inspect the boards to get them to work. My invention would produce boards with less defects so companies would hire fewer of those people and the proletariat gets bigger. Whoever is screwing with me is solving the problem of the proletariat for the rich. I suspect it is Scientology. This is why psychiatry is genocide. This is why they want to control the population.
More thoughts on inflation. How the proletariat gets bigger was revealed by Karl Marx in ‘The Communist Manifesto’ in 1848. The rich are always improving the modes of production to cut costs and increase profits. The patent office is the incentive. If this is happening as it should why are prices going up? This is something I don’t understand about solar cells and solar electricity. If this is working as it should the cost of solar should have gone down a long time ago. But it may be that the oil industry is stopping it. I talked about the strawberries. Question, does the government pay people with farm land to not grow anything? Why? Does this keep prices high? Does this keep certain people in business? Does this force global trade? How bad is the mind control problem?
Despite an ugly highway cutting through the middle, downtown Boston had a lot of small business’s. Pizza joints, bars and other things. Haymarket was an open air market where there was all manner of stuff. Now, after the Big Dig it is just strip mall America in big buildings. Kenmore Square is near the same.
Channel 7 used to be the CBS affiliate here in Boston. Channel 4 was the NBC. About ten years ago they swapped, kinda without notice. I am not exactly sure what this has to do with anything. Back in the 1970′s there was a court fight for the license for Channel 7. (I’m pretty sure) Someone just went into court and said the owners of Channel 7 were not running the station in the best interest of the public as defined by the FCC, I’m pretty sure they won.
There is too much wealth property and power in the hands of too few people. Mutual funds became very popular in the 1980′s. One type of fund is an index fund. The idea is to buy every stock on a particular index, say the S & P 500, and hold it for a long period. Historically the markets gain value over long periods. I believe that idea stops working if there isn’t enough stocks openly traded among individual investors. This is made worse when there aren’t enough small investors. I talked about how I thought downtown Boston was strip mall America in big buildings. All those small investors are gone. The entire market can be controlled by a very few people. It only looks like we all own it. If there is too large a percentage of stocks just sitting waiting and another large percentage in the hands of the very rich it will never move.
No comments:
Post a Comment